What's an NPI ?
The NPIS Registry: why ?
Who is this platform for?
-
I am a citizen, a patient, a caregiver or a professional on a first visit
-
I will be able to easily find information on interventions that are actually INMs. I will also be able to provide feedback on usage. If I want to go further, I will be directed to the conditions for accessing all the data and features of the INM Repository.
-
I am a healthcare professional wishing to access all INM files
-
I will be able to find complete information on INM protocols to deepen my knowledge and practices. I will be able to provide feedback on use.
-
I am a representative of an authority, institution or organization related to health
-
If my practice organization is a partner of the NPIS, I will be able to access all the data and functionalities of the INM Repository.
-
I would like to submit a proposal for a new INM in the Repository
-
If my project meets the definition of an INM and if it is sufficiently supported by scientifically conducted studies, I will be directed to a form which will allow me to write the INM file relating to my project.
-
I am an expert selected under the INM file validation procedure
-
If I have received an email from NPIS accrediting me as an Expert in a defined field, I will be able to register to participate in the expert procedure for which I have been requested.
Become a Submitter
Learn more about NPIS and NPI :
NPIS Questions and Answers
-
-
-
What is an evidence-based data point for an NPI?
-
An evidence-based data point is a theoretical or practical knowledge acquired through rigorous and integrated scientific methods and reasoning. The NPIS Model follows this logic in the health field (see Figure 3). It provides specific methodological and ethical recommendations for NPI for studies focusing on their mechanisms and explanatory processes (mechanistic study), their content (prototypical study), their evolution over time (observational study), their benefits and risks (interventional study), and their application and personalization modalities (implementation study).
-
-
-
-
PSYCHOSOCIAL DOMINANCE
Psychotherapies:
- Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for memory strategies in Alzheimer’s disease in 14 sessions by a psychologist in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR-BC) program against anxiety during cancer treatments in 8 group sessions by a clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, or physician in an oncology department, a patient association, a private practice, a health center, or a healthcare facility.
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain in 9 group sessions by a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in 6-8 individual sessions, either remote or in-person, by a neuropsychologist, clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, or neurologist in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- Now I Can Do Heights program using virtual reality to treat acrophobia (fear of heights) by a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist in a private practice or health center.
Health Prevention Programs:
- Living Well with COPD therapeutic education program against symptoms and exacerbations of COPD over 2 months with 4 sessions, in-person or remote, by a nurse, physician, or pharmacist in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- CHESS Method (Chronic Headache Education and Self-management) for migraine self-management by a nurse or physician in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- MyFriend Youth Program for preventing anxiety and depression among students aged 12 to 15 years, 10 sessions by a school psychologist or school nurse in an educational institution.
- Spiegel Hypnotherapy Method specialized in smoking cessation in 3 sessions by a psychologist, nurse, physician, or hypnotherapist in a private practice, healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression (CBT-d) by a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
CORPOREAL DOMINANCE
Physiotherapy Protocols:
- McKenzie Method for back pain by a physiotherapist in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) program by a midwife or physiotherapist in a health center or private practice.
- Rehabilitation program following hip prosthesis in 6 to 10 sessions by a physiotherapist in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
Adapted Physical Activity Programs:
- Dance Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease addressing psychological symptoms of Parkinson’s by a physical activity instructor in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- Re-exercise program at ventilatory threshold against dyspnea caused by COPD by a physical activity instructor or physiotherapist in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- Anti-fatigue APA program during treatments for breast, prostate, or colon cancer by a physical activity instructor in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
Thermal Treatments:
- Specialized thermal cure for gonarthrosis by a physiotherapist or thermal agent in a thermal facility.
NUTRITIONAL DOMINANCE
- Gluten-free diet for celiac disease by a dietitian in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
- FODMAP diet for gastrointestinal disorders by a dietitian in a healthcare facility, health center, or private practice.
-
Why establish a unique evaluation model for NPI?
-
A scientific validation model for medications has existed since the 1960s, with specific regulations recognized worldwide (e.g., FDA, EMA, ANSM). A similar procedure has recently been implemented for medical devices in Europe. However, until now, no consensual model existed for nutritional, bodily, and psychosocial health services due to confusions between approach, protocol, and technique/ingredient. A participatory, pragmatic, and multidisciplinary consensus work followed international scientific health recommendations to address this for NPI (Ninot et al., 2023).
This work took into account the specificities of NPI, health risks, the balance between internal and external validity, the justification of explanatory mechanisms, ethical considerations in health, and respect for contexts of use. The NPIS Model accelerates research through the harmonization of methodological and ethical expectations in NPI. It also enhances the identification, referencing, transferability, and implementation of NPI for the benefit of user health and safety, improving the quality of training.
Ultimately, the NPIS Model distinguishes between individualized, science-based services aimed at addressing known health issues in Western medicine and occupational practices (lifestyle, art of living, work, sociocultural activity, personal development, pursuit of happiness, spiritual practice, etc.). In this sense, the model does not impede individuals' freedom to choose a particular lifestyle. It aims to address a specific health issue for an individual or a group of people within a limited timeframe and a framework regulated by the health sector. The NPIS Model encourages innovations across all other health sectors, particularly in health organizations and early identification actions for health problems. -
What is the added value of the NPIS Registry for a healthcare professional?
-
Accessible Protocols in Consultation
- Enhanced Quality and Safety: Strengthens the quality and safety of existing practices through formalization, harmonization, and securitization.
- Integration with Professional Software: Codified NPI can be integrated into healthcare management software.
- Digital Documentation: Access to documentation from computers, tablets, or smartphones for ease of use.
- Broad Validation: Extends validation to all relevant professionals in the region.
- Quick and Easy Access: Facilitates rapid access to information at critical decision-making moments for prevention and care.
- Simplicity in Tracking: Eases the follow-up and evolutionary process of best implementation practices (e.g., identifying barriers, professional leadership, availability of training and support).
Quality Control and Adherence to Protocols
- Traceability: Utilizes unique coded protocols for tracking.
- Strengthened Care Link: Enhances the relationship between care provision and patient support.
- Monitoring Relevant Indicators: Provides tools for tracking key performance indicators.
- Continuous Education Tool: Serves as a resource for ongoing professional development.
- Regular Updates: Incorporates regular updates based on user feedback.
Means of Valuation
- Response to Identified Multidisciplinary Issues: Addresses problems identified by healthcare teams in a specific territory.
- Extended Roles for Various Professionals: Expands the roles of many professionals, particularly non-physicians.
- Elimination of Ineffective Protocols: Phases out protocols that are ineffective, hazardous, or costly.
- Reduction in Meeting Time: Decreases the need for multiple meetings focused on intervention planning.
- Support for Innovation: Encourages professionals to experiment with new practices, boosting their confidence.
- Financial Valuation: Ensures appropriate financial and resource allocation for effective implementation.
Our supporters
Our partners
Our allies
